Appendix 9: Sample meeting report
Minutes of Project: <Enter project name>
Date: <enter the date of the conversation/meeting>
Note-taker: <enter the name of the person who prepared this document>
Present: <enter the names of those who were present for this discussion>
Absent with notice: <enter the names of those who were absent with notice>
Absent without notice: <enter the names of those who were absent without notice>
<Enter the list of topics as they appeared on the agenda during the meeting. For example:>
Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting
Discussion of action list
Discussion of decision list
Discussion of issue log
Discussion of risk log (new risks and obstacles)
Consultation with management
1. Approval of minutes from previous meeting
Piet remarked that his comments concerning the developments of new software by the competition were not accurately recorded in the report. He will send a brief e-mail to the note-taker with a correct reflection of his ideas. The others in attendance approved the minutes.
2. Action list
A number of actions were cancelled, and other new actions were reported.
3. Decision list
Please refer to the separate action-and-decision list for information on the decisions that were taken.
4. Issue log
Please refer to the separate issue log for information on the issues that are currently awaiting action.
No new issues were reported this week.
5. Risk log
HHenk has learned of a new risk that we had overlooked. What should we do if our software supplier declares bankruptcy? This risk has been noted in the risk log. Klaas will consider the matter further and see what our contracts with the supplier say in this regard.
Please refer to the risk log for further information.
6. Project progress
The Java wing is working hard to realise the software. Three engineers are now assigned to the project.
The testers are working to prepare the test scripts. Henk asked Marie whether he had sent this to Floor. Kees reported that the plans for detail testing are not deliverables. The test scripts are, however, if the partner wishes insight into the plans in question. This is obviously always possible.
Floor reported that she is now working on a new name for the product. Henk will go ahead and prepare a change proposal that will explain the impact of this change on the project. The estimate for licenses has now been received from the supplier.
Floor remarked that she would like to submit another report to the financer in early October. We agreed to submit the report to the partner five working days after the end of September.
Participants in the previous period
Name Position Piet Pieterse Operations manager Jan Jansen Project leader Etc. Lead Engineer Client PRODUCT Technical Architect Lead Engineer Server PRODUCT Java Engineer Quality/Testing manager Testing Coordinator
Participants in the coming period
Name Position Klaas Klaaszoon Operations manager Marie de Boer Project leader Etc. Lead Engineer Client PRODUCT Technical Architect Lead Engineer Server PRODUCT Java Engineer Java Engineer Java Engineer Java Engineer Quality/Testing manager Testing Coordinator Tester
7. Schedule adjustments
The chart below reflects the new schedule, which the current project partners consider realistic at this time.
Phase/Milestone Starting date/Milestone Ending date Who Preparation 7-4-03 6-6-2003 Partner1 Design 7-4-03 6-6-2003 Partner1 + partner2 Decision-making 10-6-2003 13-6-2003 Partner1 + partner2 Design approval 13-6-2003 13-6-2003 Partner2 Implementation/Testing 30-6-2003 28-11-2003 Partner1 Delivery of first version 28-11-2003 28-11-2003 Partner1 Test of acceptance 1-12-2003 2-01-2004 Partner2 Support for acceptance test 1-12-2003 2-01-2004 Partner1 Acceptance 2-01-2004 2-01-2004 Partner2 Substantive user test 2-01-2004 25-06-2003 Partner2 Support for substantive user test 2-01-2004 25-06-2003 Partner1 Optimisation 28-06-2003 27-08-2003 Partner1 Delivery of second version 27-08-2003 27-08-2003 Partner1 Guarantee 27-08-2003 26-11-2004 Partner1
8. Consultation with management
In his role as project leader, Klaas had consulted with management. Management would like the project to be completed within one month, or two at the most. Klaas reported that he did not consider this feasible, but that the team would do its best to make it (the impossible) possible.
9. Question round
Marie remarked that the meeting had already lasted for two hours, even though the goal had been to limit it to forty-five minutes. She asked everyone to try to keep the meetings short.
Henk states that he will be unable to attend the next meeting.
Tuesday 19 augustus 2006
Partner 1, Rotterdam office
Klaas, Henk, Floor, Marie
- Meeting report from previous meeting
- Action list
- Decision list
- Deviations from specifications
- Project progress
- Scheduling (milestones/changes)
- Issue log
- Risks and obstacles
- Other matters/Question round
Action/Decision list for the Project
Bekijk deze pagina in het Nederlands